Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 SO2D 931 - Downs v. Austin

Downs v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2012

9 state decisions

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 453 So. 2d 1102 - Downs v. State · 493 So. 2d 480 - Tribune Co. v. Public Records · 476 So. 2d 775 - Bludworth v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. · 514 So. 2d 1069 - The Florida Bar v. Rodis · Downs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Satz [v. Blankenship, 407 So.2d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) ] and Bludworth evince a judicial recognition that once the State has gone public with information which could have previously been protected from disclosure under the Act's exemptions, no further purpose is served by preventing full access to the desired documents or information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.