Harryman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2013
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Gerstein v. Pugh · Draper v. United States · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If a statement is admissible as res gestae the fact that it is made in response to an inquiry, or while under arrest does not render the testimony inadmissible. Spann, supra [Spann v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 448 S.W.2d 128 ]; Fowler v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 513 , 287 S.W.2d 665 ; Heath v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 375 S.W.2d 909 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Newberry v. State“condom tied in a knot and there were several others inside of that one, smaller ones inside of the larger one”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harryman v. Estelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.