Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 F.2d 461 - Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent

Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis

523 F.2d 461 · 1975

Citation profile

943
cited by 943 later decisions
8
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

238 federal appellate · 466 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 943 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company (1990), Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. (1990)

238 federal appellate · 466 district · 32 state decisions

4750197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Griffin v. Breckenridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 943 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “going beyond the allegations of the complaint.”
    66 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.