Toyomenka, Inc. v. S.S. Tosaharu Maru’s Empirical Analysis
523 F.2d 518 · 1975
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/V Peisander (1981), American Home Assurance Company v. Hapag Lloyd Container Linie Gmbh 04-5605 Cv (2006)
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Robert Herd Company v. Krawill Machinery Corporation · Shapiro v. Thompson · Yumich v. City of Chicago · Boston Metals Company the St Francis v. The S/s Winding Gulf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`all servants, agents and independent contractors... [u]sed or employed by the Carrier. '”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“all servants, agents and independent contractors (including in particular, but not by way of limitation, any stevedores) used or employed by the Carrier for the purpose of or in connection with the performance of any of the Carrier's obligations under this Bill of Lading....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“did not cover the independent contractor, we stated: 32 McRoberts [the contractor] was not employed by the carrier in the usual sense of that term.... We are not persuaded by the argument that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.