Tyson v. Maher’s Empirical Analysis
523 F.2d 972 · 1975
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1995
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. · United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno · United States Department of Agriculture v. Murry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court long ago recognized the difference, in terms of the necessity for notice and hearing, between regulations having the force of law, on the one hand, and interpretative rules, on the other: Administrative officials frequently announce their views as to the meaning of regulations. Generally speaking, it seems to be established that ‘regulations’ . . . are those which create law, usually implementary to an existing law, whereas interpretative rules are statements as to what the administrative officer thinks the regulation means.” (Emphasis supplied), [citation omitted] This difference is also reflected in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553 (b)(3)(A), wherein it is specifically states that the notice and hearing requirements of that statute do not apply to ‘interpretative rules.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Reyes v. Klein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.