Archuleta v. Wagner’s Empirical Analysis
523 F.3d 1278 · 2008
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2020 · most notably Mink v. Knox (2010), Bull v. City of San Francisco (2010)
10 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Terry v. Ohio · Bell v. Wolfish · Chimel v. California · Baker v. McCollan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“accept as true all well-pleaded facts, as distinguished from conclusory allegations”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the defendant's [alleged conduct] violated a constitutional or statutory right'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moya v. Garcia · Moya v. Garcia“the right was 'clearly established at the time of the [violation].'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moya v. Garcia · Moya v. Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.