Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 F.3d 310 - United States v. Reid

United States v. Reid’s Empirical Analysis

523 F.3d 310 · 2008

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Robinson (2010), United States v. Howard (2014)

13 federal appellate ·

560200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Pinkerton v. United States · United States v. Burgos · United States of America v. Marion Promise

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) an agreement to possess heroin with the intent to distribute existed between two or more persons; (2) [Williams] knew of the conspiracy; and (3) [Williams] knowingly and voluntarily become part of the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.