¶1concurring.
¶2I concur with the majority except on its reasoning concerning the trial court's failure to advise Hatcher of the possibility of an increased sentence and that the court was not bound by the plea agreement.
¶3Under White v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 893 both those errors were harmless because the trial court, in fact, honored the plea agreement and imposed the three year sentence agreed to by Hatcher.
¶4The judgment should be affirmed.