Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 NW2D 909 - State v. Knutson

State v. Knutson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2012

5 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Branzburg v. Hayes · Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board · Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. · Heaslip v. Freeman · 602 F. Supp. 675 - Miller v. Mecklenburg County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Reporters Shield Law does not apply where, as here, no source is at risk and the reporter would testify regarding events personally witnessed. * * * Rosen has no constitutional privilege not to testify regarding his personal observation of an assault. * * * Neither the Minnesota Reporters Shield Law nor the Constitution provide Rosen a privilege not to testify regarding events he personally witnessed while covering a story.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 595.023 only prohibits compelled direct or indirect disclosure of sources” and that "the statute does not apply where, as here, the unpublished information would not identify a source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Section 595.023 only prohibits compelled direct or indirect disclosure of sources” and that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.