Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 P2D 172 - Modrok v. Marshall

Modrok v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2022

1 district · 16 state decisions

80197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. · Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg · West Side Trust & Savings Bank v. Lopoten · Rabbit v. Atkinson · Schroeder v. Woody

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a settled rule of property that circumstances . . . which suggest outstanding equities in third parties, impose a duty upon the purchaser to make a reasonable investigation into the existence of a claim. Given suspicious facts, the status of bona fide purchaser turns upon whether there was a prudent inquiry into their import.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A suit'for forcible [entry and] de-tainer . . . substitutes the authority of the courts for private force to compel a citizen wrongfully in possession of real property to surrender it to another with a superior claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In an action to recover the possession on the land, tenement, or other real property where the entry is forcible or when the possession is unlawfully held by force, there shall be no inquiry into the merits of the title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.