523 So. 2d 1037 - Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Gray v. State (1998), 551 So. 2d 165 - Davis v. State (1989)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McFee v. State · Johnson v. State · 473 So. 2d 452 - Winters v. State · 449 So. 2d 756 - Wiley v. State · 463 So. 2d 1070 - Kelly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review in judging the sufficiency of the evidence on motion for directed verdict requires that we accept as true all evidence favorable to the State, together with reasonable inferences arising therefrom, to disregard the evidence favorable to the defendant, and if such evidence would support a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, the trial court's denial of the motion must be affirmed.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stringer v. State“is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will be upheld unless there is abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stringer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.