523 So. 2d 1253 - State v. Castanedo’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 515 So. 2d 748 - Shull v. Dugger · 519 So. 2d 611 - Atwaters v. State · State v. Mesa · 523 So. 2d 726 - Harrison v. State · State v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause all of the recited reasons are invalid, the trial court may not enunciate new reasons to support a departure sentence. Thus, there is no need for a written statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.