Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 So. 2d 1266 - Leyte-Vidal v. Murray

523 So. 2d 1266 - Leyte-Vidal v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 666 - Moore v. Morris · 333 So. 2d 25 - Nardone v. Reynolds · 444 So. 2d 407 - Marty v. State · Reams v. Vaughn · 453 So. 2d 1376 - Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Tillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where there is a factual question as to notice or discovery in a medical malpractice action, it is for the jury to decide when the statute of limitation commences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.