¶1We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Count I of the complaint alleging fraud on the part of appellees. We find that count properly tracked the elements of fraudulent conduct in setting out the claim and stated facts with sufficient specificity. Peninsular Fla. Dist. Council of Assemblies of God v. Pan Am. Inv., 450 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We affirm the dismissal of Counts II and III for failure to state a cause of action. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); First Church of Christ Scientist v. City of St. Petersburg, 344 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).
523 So. 2d 1279
523 So.2d 1279
13 Fla.L.Weekly 1069
Nadel v. Gross
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 3, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-03
Relies on 89 So. 2d 482 - Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc. · 450 So. 2d 1231 - PENINSULAR FLA. DIST. COUNCIL v. Pan Am. Inv. and Dev. Corp. · 344 So. 2d 1302 - FIRST CHURCH, ETC. v. City of St. Petersburg
Decided 1988-05-03