523 So. 2d 152 - State v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery (2010), 945 So. 2d 1203 - Pizzo v. State (2006)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 403 So. 2d 954 - Redondo v. State · Pitts v. State · Allison v. Mayo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Henceforth, when a Carawan analysis is applied and one of two convictions must fall, we hold that the conviction of the lesser crime should be set aside.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“As in cases where double jeopardy is applied to dual convictions, Shade v. State, 400 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), there appears to be no reason why the lesser conviction should not be vacated since the defendant has been found guilty of both crimes, [n.3] Henceforth, when a Carawan [v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987),] analysis is applied and one of two convictions must fall, we hold that the conviction of the lesser crime should be set aside. [N.3.] In cases involving convictions of both the greater and lesser included offenses, it is the lesser rather than the greater sentence which is vacated. See Russell v. State, 430 So.2d 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Ervin v. State, 419 So.2d 409 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.