Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 So. 2d 283 - State v. Gooden

523 So. 2d 283 - State v. Gooden’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2016

15 state decisions

801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · State v. Gilmore · 372 So. 2d 1202 - State v. Cook · 424 So. 2d 256 - State v. Dufore · State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “B. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit the defendant from entering a plea of guilty to a crime nonresponsive to the original indictment when such a plea is acceptable to the district attorney, and in such ease, the district | ¡¡attorney shall not be required to file a new indictment to charge the crime to which the plea is offered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The article states that when a defendant wishes to plead guilty to a crime not responsive to that charged in tiro indictment and the district attorney agrees, then nothing contained in the article prohibits the defendant from making such a plea and the district attorney is not required to file a new indictment. The article does not indicate whether the bill can, should, or must be amended. We cannot infer a positive intent from tills silence on the part of the legislature to impose an obligation to amend the bill, particularly an obligation that divests the trial courts of jurisdiction when it is not satisfied and that defeats the wishes and best interests of the defendant in making the plea,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.