523 So. 2d 475 - Waldrop v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Cronic · Gerstein v. Pugh · Baker v. McCollan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“During Fannin and Pitts [sic] preparation for trial, they attempted to prepare petitioner for what was ahead, including trial procedures and the fact that there would be a sentencing hearing. (See Tab R-43, p. 7). Additionally, Fannin and Pitts could not put petitioner on the stand because it would have allowed the prosecution to go into the details of petitioner’s prior double-murder conviction. They discussed this at length with petitioner and petitioner did not want to testify. Also, Fannin and Pitts had to be concerned that if petitioner testified, he might tell the jury that he preferred death to life without parole. (See Tab R-43, p. 9).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`core purpose' of the counsel guarantee is to assure and aid at trial, `when the accused [is] confronted with both the intricacies of the law and the advocacy of the public prosecutor.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.