Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 523 SO2D 760 - Stemm v. State

Stemm v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1988
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 492 So. 2d 1344 - Fowler v. State · 462 So. 2d 62 - Kresbach v. State · 501 So. 2d 176 - Brooks v. State · 489 So. 2d 1198 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the State did not rebut appellant's reasonable hypothesis of innocence, appellant urges that this Court must reverse and direct that he be discharged, citing Fowler v. State, 492 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We agree that the State's case wholly failed to establish an inference clearly inconsistent with appellant's hypothesis of innocence... . In the instant case, nothing in the State's case in chief was inconsistent with appellant's argument that he had no knowledge of the cigarette's presence. Significant is the fact that the pack had been circulated among other inmates and had been out of appellant's exclusive control for a period of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.