¶1The issue of double jeopardy raised by defendant in this appeal, following his conviction of felonious assault with malice aforethought and armed robbery, arises from the facts set forth in State v. Ross, 523 S.W.2d 841, decided this date. For the reasons and authorities contained in Rossthe defendant’s point is denied, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
¶2All concur.