Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 F.2d 1009 - Barbara SABOL, Appellee, v. John E. SNYDER, Appellant

Barbara SABOL, Appellee, v. John E. SNYDER, Appellant’s Empirical Analysis

524 F.2d 1009 · 1975

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably United States v. Guzman (1988), Robert FLOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROUCH-WALKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee (1977)

32 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

280197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Claude E. LONG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant · Franklin v. Skelly Oil Co. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““McDonnell requires that to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, the plaintiff show (1) that she is a member of a racial minority; (2) that she applied and qualified for a position for which the employer was seeking applicants; (3) that she was rejected in spite of her qualifications; and (4) that the position remained open and the employer continued to seek applicants.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is obviously not the function of the appellate court to try the facts or substitute for the trial court in the determination of factual issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.