Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 F.2d 1058 - Wright v. Stone Container Corp.

Wright v. Stone Container Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

524 F.2d 1058 · 1975

Citation profile

145
cited by 145 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 145 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1978), United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald (1977)

61 federal appellate · 14 district · 8 state decisions

68019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Ristaino v. Ross · Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · De Leon v. United States · Parham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 145 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Except for two vague references at the class hearing, Wright could not identify any person who had been subjected to the same or similar discriminatory treatment as he allegedly suffered .... The typicality requirement of Rule 23(a)(3) obligates the class representative to at least demonstrate that there are other members of the class who have similar grievances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[T]he typicality requirement of Rule 23(a)(3) obligates the class representative to at least demonstrate that there are other members of the class who have similar grievances.... ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.