United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis
524 F.2d 1249 · 1975
Citation profile
42 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably United States v. Harris (1976), United States v. Stricklin (1979)
42 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pereira v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Illinois v. Somerville · Serfass v. United States · Downum v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. Appellant has the opportunity under Rule 35 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure to move for reduction of sentence within 120 days after the receipt of our mandate. The attention of counsel is specifically directed to this fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may have traveled together from Texas to New Mexico will not convert these multiple offenses into a single violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.