Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 F.2d 918 - Manchack v. S/S Overseas Progress

Manchack v. S/S Overseas Progress’s Empirical Analysis

524 F.2d 918 · 1975

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 1994

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

120197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Lavender v. Kurn · McCarthy v. American Eastern Corp. · Gooden v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Curd v. Todd-Johnson Dry Docks, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is an evidentiary basis for the jury's verdict, this Court's function is exhausted, and [the plaintiff] is not free to relitigate the factual dispute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Maintenance and cure] was intended to assure [the injured seaman] three meals a day and a bed in which to sleep during his treatment and convalescence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.