Hannon v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
524 F.3d 275 · 2008
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 34 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'n · Sawtelle v. Farrell · Pritzker v. Yari · Phillips Exeter Academy v. Howard Phillips Fund, Inc. · Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is axiomatic that, '[t]o hear a case, a court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, the claim underlying the litigation must directly arise out of, or relate to, the defendant’s forum-state activities. Second, the defendant’s in-state contacts must represent a purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of that state’s laws and making the defendant’s involuntary presence before the state’s court foreseeable. Third, the exercise of jurisdiction must ... be reasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept the plaintiff's (properly documented) evidentiary proffers as true, and construe those facts in the light most congenial to the plaintiff's jurisdictional claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.