Pardini Ex rel. Pardini v. Allegheny Intermediate Unit’s Empirical Analysis
524 F.3d 419 · 2008
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Acumed LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc. (2009), Kossler v. Crisanti (2009)
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 20 U.S.C. § 1416 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Kay v. Ehrler · Branch v. Smith · United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Township of Warrington · Bankers Trust Company Ss Edgar Queeny Sa v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Bp Oil Inc Bankers Trust Company · O. Hommel Company v. Ferro Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n abuse of discretion ... when [the] district court's decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]o the extent that [a case within the circuit] is read to be inconsistent with earlier case law, the earlier case law .,. controls.”); O. Hommel Co. v. Ferro Corp., 659 F.2d 340 , 354 (3d Cir. 1981) ’(“[A] panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel precedent. To the extent, that [the later case] is inconsistent with [the earlier case, the later case] must be deemed without effect.” (internal citation omitted)). 24 . Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Hyundai Merch. Marine Co., 63 F.3d 1227 , 1232 (3d Cir. 1995) (citation omitted). 25 . Resp’t's Br, 19; Maj. Op. 517 (contending that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Karns v. Shanahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.