Starns v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
524 F.3d 612 · 2008
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Holland v. Florida (2010), Holland v. Florida (2010)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Houston v. Lack · Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n · Flanagan v. Johnson · Coleman v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he essential question is not whether the relevant information was known by a large number of people, but whether the petitioner should be expected to take actions which would lead him to the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborne v. Hall“the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborne v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.