Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 FSUPP2D 1267 - Edmonds v. Getty

Edmonds v. Getty’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aronson v. Lewis · Janas v. McCracken · Brehm v. Eisner · Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc. · Desimone v. Barrows

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ackdating options qualifies as one of those `rare cases [in which] a transaction may be so egregious on its face that board approval cannot meet the test of business judgment, and a substantial likelihood of director liability therefore exists.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “during” the lowest market price of the month (or year). Use of the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.