Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 NE2D 279 - Kindred v. State

Kindred v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably United States v. Winstar Corp. (1996), State v. Haight-Gyuro (2008)

43 state decisions

21019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · United States v. Agurs · Griffin v. California · Ashe v. Swenson · Gilbert v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has been flagrant and deliberate, or so misleading or in such bad faith as to impair the right of fair trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as to communications made to each other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If when application is made for discharge of a defendant under this rule, the court be satisfied that there is evidence for the state, which cannot then be had, that reasonable effort has been made to procure the same and there is just ground to believe that such evidence can be had within ninety (90) days, the cause may be continued, and the prisoner remanded or admitted to bail; and if he be not brought to trial by the state within such additional ninety (90) days, he shall then be discharged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.