Shady v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2016
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alfaro v. State · 159 Ind. App. 470 - Williams v. State · Doughty v. State · Smith v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The record in this case discloses that Shady did not personally waive his right to a jury trial in that there is no indication that he was present at the time. Cf Smith [v. State (1983), Ind.App.] supra, 451 N.E.2d [57] at 60 (Court specifically did not address whether á waiver by counsel in defendant’s presence could satisfy the requirement that the waiver be personal). Shady submitted an uncon-troverted affidavit stating inter alia that he did not authorize his first attorney to waive a trial by jury on his behalf. Consequently, the trial court erred in denying Shady a trial by jury based upon the alleged waiver by his first attorney. 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Combs v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.