Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 NE2D 774 - Hodges v. State

Hodges v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Barger v. State (1992), Stewart v. State (1990)

25 state decisions

1801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Mahan v. Howell · Patterson v. State · Lagenour v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Daniel, supra, at 1278 . Consequently, Adams' claim is without merit. VIII. Culpability In his brief, Adams contends that the trial court erred in refusing to give his tendered instruction #9, which described the culpability required for reckless conduct, even though Adams' conduct was not charged as being reckless. At trial, however, Adams made no such objection, consequently waiving this”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[h]owever, in view of the unemphasized nature of the comment and the other evidence tending to show [defendant's] guilt, [which included a statement by defendant admitting to several instances of child molestation,] we find there is no substantial likelihood that the evidence contributed to the verdict, and we deem it to be [sic] have been harmless”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Here, the previous acts of Hodges were similar enough to the charged crimes to merit introduction under the depraved sexual instinet rule. Both involved a minor as a victim and were similar in time and proximity. There was no error in the introduction of this evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.