Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 P2D 33 - Shockey v. State

Shockey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1987
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Turman v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 310 - Langley v. State · Moore v. State · Smith v. State · 70 Okla. Crim. 39 - Underhill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he possession of recently stolen goods is a strong circumstance to be considered in a larceny prosecution; but the possession of stolen property alone, and without any additional testimony, will not sustain a charge of larceny. It may be slight and wholly circumstantial, but there must be some evidence to connect the defendant with the original asportation. . . .” 104 P.2d at 449”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.