Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 P.3d 424 - State v. Scheetz

State v. Scheetz’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Carcieri v. Salazar · State v. Gunby · State v. King · State v. Bryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no information . . . as to what these videos depicted apart from the titles, leaving the jury to speculate about their actual content.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “no indication as to how long Scheetz accessed these webpages or whether he even watched the videos they contain”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “actively litigated the admissibility of this evidence under K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 60-455(d)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.