Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 SO2D 108 - Pope v. Whitfield

Pope v. Whitfield’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2011

4 state decisions

201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Banks v. ADMINISTRATOR OF DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SEC. · Charbonnet v. Gerace · 377 So. 2d 407 - Simmons v. Gerace · Washington v. Sumrall · Burrell v. Seguros America Banamex, S.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any proceeding under this Section the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.