Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

524 So. 2d 1117

524 So.2d 1117

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1175

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1989

1 state decisions

Relies on 509 So. 2d 1088 - Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines (Rules 3.701 & 3.988) · 460 So. 2d 589 - Hendry v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

FRANK, Judge.

¶1The appellant, Willie Bee Daniels, urges on appeal that his guidelines scoresheet erroneously includes points for victim inju*1118ry. He is correct. At the time he committed the offense of robbery without a weapon, victim injury was only scored when it was an element of the offense committed.* Victim injury is not an element of robbery without a weapon; therefore, it was incorrectly included in the scoresheet computations. Hendry v. State, 460 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

¶2This matter is remanded for the preparation of a correct scoresheet. Daniels should be resentenced within the applicable guidelines range.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

¶3A 1987 amendment to the guidelines provides that victim injury is to be scored for each victim injured during a criminal transaction or episode. See, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re Sentencing Guidelines (Rules 3.701 and 3.988), 509 So.2d 1088 (Fla.1987).

/524/so2d/1117 · .json · Public domain