State v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 398 So. 2d 1049 - State v. Jones · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere · 419 So. 2d 458 - State v. Huffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“La.Code Cr. Proe. art. 162 provides: A search warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of the judge, by the affidavit of a credible person, reciting facts establishing the cause for issuance of the warrant. A search warrant shall particularly describe the person or place to be searched, the persons or things to be seized, and the lawful purpose or reason for the search or seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In determining if the particularity requirement of Art. 162 has been satisfied, the affidavit and search warrant should be reviewed in a common sense and realistic manner, without technical requirements of elaborate specificity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.