Morris v. State

Christopher Ray MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 1988.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-05

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1990

7 state decisions

Relies on 519 So. 2d 618 - Mays v. State · Harriel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant, Christopher Ray Morris, challenges the imposition of $225 in costs pursuant to sections 27.3455(1), 960.20 and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1985).

¶5Pursuant to the recent Florida Supreme Court cases of Harriel v. State,520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988), and Mays v. State,519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988), we quash the imposition of costs below and remand for assessment of costs after notice and hearing in accordance with Harriel and Mays.

¶6IT IS SO ORDERED.

¶7SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.