Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

524 So. 2d 501

524 So.2d 501

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1117

State v. Pinder

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1990

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Garcia · State v. Suco

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-05-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In response to the state’s appeal from the trial court’s ruling granting suppression of evidence and discharge, counsel for appellee filed a memorandum brief confessing error and a motion for leave to withdraw. Proceeding in the manner outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 19 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), this court permitted appellee thirty days within which to file a statement of points. Appellee has not filed his brief or statement. Accordingly, we hold that the state’s appeal has merit. See United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Torres, 741 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir.1984). Cf. State v. Suco, 521 So.2d 1100 (Fla.1988) (owner of premises, not casual visitor, has standing to challenge search as violative of fourth amendment rights).

¶2Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

/524/so2d/501 · .json · Public domain