Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 SO2D 660 - State v. Jano

State v. Jano’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 679 So. 2d 710 - Pope v. State (1996), 689 So. 2d 239 - Henyard v. State (1996)

67 state decisions

3001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burgess v. State · Lancaster v. People · 121 Ill. App. 3d 1092 - In Re Marriage of Theis · 483 So. 2d 70 - Begley v. State · 500 So. 2d 184 - Salter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) there must be an event startling enough to cause nervous excitement; (2) the statement must have been made before there was time to contrive or misrepresent; and (3) the statement must be made while the person is under the stress of excitement caused by the event.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here the time interval between the event and the statement is long enough to permit reflective thought, the statement will be excluded in the absence of some proof that the declarant did not in fact engage in a reflective thought process.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] statement or excited utterance relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.