524 So. 2d 715 - Musgrove v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 500 So. 2d 134 - Keys v. State · 504 So. 2d 392 - Williams v. State · 492 So. 2d 1308 - Williams v. State · 469 So. 2d 128 - Weems v. State · 510 So. 2d 930 - Carter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact that a defendant's record reflects the commission of offenses which cannot be scored because the offenses were committed when the defendant was a juvenile may ... be a valid reason for departure... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Blue v. State“if the juvenile record is extensive, and only if the juvenile offenses were disposed of by adjudications equivalent to conviction of an adult.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Blue v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.