¶1Because appellant has stated that the only issue to be raised in this appeal is whether the sentence imposed is an illegal departure from the recommended sentence under the guidelines, and because the state acknowledges that appellant’s sentence is an improper sentence in excess of the guidelines, appellant’s sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentenc-ing. Compare Rivers v. State, 513 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hope v. State, 513 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
524 So. 2d 719
524 So.2d 719
13 Fla.L.Weekly 1079
Taylor v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 6, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-06
Relies on 513 So. 2d 217 - Hope v. State · 513 So. 2d 766 - Rivers v. State
Decided 1988-05-06