¶1Joseph Huey Clary appeals from concurrent sentences for robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We remand appellant’s sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon for conformance of the written sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
¶2We do not reach the sentencing guidelines issue raised by appellant because we *733conclude, upon review of the sentencing hearing transcript, that defense counsel effectively withdrew his objection to the scoring of a third prior breaking and entering conviction, the existence of which he initially questioned. Since this alleged error involves a factual issue not apparent from the record before us, it is not reviewable. Johnson v. State, 506 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). As in Johnson, however, we note that on remand the trial court should correct any scoresheet errors proven by the parties.
¶3REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.