Lumpkin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cherb v. State · Payne v. State · Reynolds v. State · Imoreno v. State · Alvarez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Hearsay is without probative value, even if admitted without objection. Mendoza v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 522 S.W.2d 898 (1975); Reynolds v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 866 . It constitutes no evidence, and will not be considered in determining the sufficiency of the evidence. Payne v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 480 S.W.2d 732 ; Cherb v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 273 ; Rogers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 772 ; O’Beirne v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d 787 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.