Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 SW2D 38 - State v. Gardner

State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McGautha v. California · State v. Thomas · State v. Mucie · State v. Agee · State v. Crockett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court must be given the opportunity by timely objection to pass upon the propriety, of questions, and where the defendant foregoes objection, as occurred here, the trial court should not be convicted of error . . . . State v. Gardner, 524 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Mo.App.1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... (1) was the penalty the maximum provided by law, (2) was the crime a brutal one, (3) how long did it take the jury to reach its verdict, (4) were there instances of inflammatory conduct or other prejudice producing events in the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.