Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 SW2D 449 - State v. Rutledge

State v. Rutledge’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably State v. Berry (1980), State v. Collett (1976)

49 state decisions

3301975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If you do not find that the defendant, after the incident in question and while confined, broke out or left the Municipal Jail of the City of St. Louis for the purpose and with the intent to avoid trial for the offense with which he is charged in this cause, then such breaking out or leaving is a circumstance which may not be taken into account or consideration by you in connection with all the other facts and circumstances in the case in determining the guilt or innocence of the charge placed against the defendant. NOT IN MAI SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANT.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unexplained flight is a relevant circumstance in connection with guilt or innocence. Flight may be either from the scene of the crime or elsewhere if it is in order to avoid arrest or prosecution. Remoteness of the flight — in space and time — from the scene and time of the alleged crime goes only to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility. . 2 (State v. Rutledge, 524 S.W.2d 449, 458 (Mo.1975))”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.