Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 S.W.2d 814 - Martinez v. Euler

Martinez v. Euler’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1981
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Glidden Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company · Flowers v. Muse · Walker v. S & T Truck Lines, Inc. · Cattle Land Oil Co. v. Willis Drilling Company, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 356, T.R.C.P., provides that the appeal bond ‘shall’ be filed with the clerk within 30 days after the rendition of judgment or order overruling motion for new trial. The time limits imposed by Rule 356 are mandatory and jurisdictional. Failure to comply with these rules results in the appeal not being perfected. This Court does not acquire any jurisdiction over this case except to dismiss the appeal. [citations omitted] (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.