Charles v. Spradling’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 3 Cal. 4th 758 - Woosley v. State of California (1992), Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation Commission (1993)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Kleban v. Morris · Hooks v. Comptroller of the Treasury · Henderson v. Carter · Hansen v. County of Lincoln
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a state consents to be sued, it may be sued only in the manner and to the extent provided by the statute; and the state may prescribe the procedure to be followed and such other terms and conditions as it sees fit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.