Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 524 S.W.2d 97 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2002 · most notably State v. Royal (1981), State v. Kilgore (1989)

41 state decisions

1701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Harris v. New York · Dennis v. United States · Walder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If at any time during the course of the proceeding it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to make disclosure of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, exclude such evidence, or enter such other orders as it deems just under the circumstances. Wilful violation by counsel of an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto may subject counsel to appropriate sanctions by the court.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It has often been said that the right of cross-examination is accepted as a universal right, a right basic to our judicial system and one of the most valuable rights given by the law. The right to prove inconsistent statements that the witness has denied on cross-examination is a necessary extension to the right of cross-examination. These two rights, when combined, provide perhaps the most effective truth-searching device known to the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and hence was not subject to review only for abuse of discretion. We went on to decide the case on the application of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.