Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 F.2d 113 - Andrews v. Maher

Andrews v. Maher’s Empirical Analysis

525 F.2d 113 · 1975

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2009 · most notably Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization (1979), Lawrence v. Kozlowski (1976)

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2801975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Dandridge v. Williams · Hagans v. Lavine · Rosado v. Wyman · Patterson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While (the Supremacy Clause) is the reason why a state law that conflicts with a federal statute is invalid, it is the federal statute that confers whatever rights the individual is seeking to vindicate.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is a difference between extending section 1343(4) to laws such as these, which protect specific rights and engender comparatively little litigation, and applying it to section 1983, which protects all rights 'secured by the Constitution and laws.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.