Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

525 F.2d 1203

Docket No. 74--2784.

Calhoun v. Cook

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1975-12-31

3 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[i]t would blink reality and authority ... to hold the Atlanta School System to be nonunitary because further integration is theoretically possible”

quoted by 3 later decisions, including 460 F. Supp. 299 - Bradley v. Milliken, Morgan v. Nucci

Relies on Davis v. Board of School Comm'rs of Mobile Cty. · United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education · United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1975-12-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably Ross v. Houston Independent School District (1983), Davis v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board (1983)

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

150197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Elizabeth R. Rindskopf, John R. Myer, Atlanta, Ga., Norman J. Chachkin, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, for Calhoun and others.

Margie Pitts Hames, Glenna L. Stone, Atlanta, Ga., for Armour and others.

Warren C. Fortson, Prentiss Q. Yancey, Jr., Bruce H. Beerman, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Oct. 23, 1975, 5 Cir., 1975, 522 F.2d 717).

before WISDOM, THORNBERRY and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The Petitions for Rehearing are denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petitions for Rehearing En Banc are denied.

¶2

Plaintiff-appellants assert that our holding is inconsonant with the rule of Davis v. School Commissioners of Mobile County, 402 U.S. 33, 37, 91 S.Ct. 1289, 1292, 28 L.Ed.2d 577 (1971), requiring 'every effort to achieve the greatest possible degree of actual desegregation, taking into account the practicalities of the situation' and the rule of United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966), affirmed en banc 380 F.2d 385, 389 (1967), that 'public schools in this circuit have the affirmative duty under the Fourteenth Amendment to bring about an integrated, unitary school system in which there are no Negro schools and no white schools--just schools.'

¶3

These assertions are inaccurate. This panel could not and does not depart from prior precedents. It would blink reality and authority, however, to hold the Atlanta School System to be nonunitary because further racial integration is theoretically possible and we expressly decline to do so. See Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education, D.C., 377 F.Supp. 1123, affirmed 511 F.2d 1374 (5th Cir.), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied 511 F.2d at 1390 (June 27, 1975), cert. denied --- U.S. ---, 96 S.Ct. 394, 46 L.Ed.2d 303 (Nov. 17, 1975). We also judicially notice the corresponding declaration of unitary status by Judge Herbert W. Christenberry relating to the Orleans Parish School System. Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, Civ.Ac.No. 3630 (E.D.La., August 22, 1975).

/525/f2d/1203 · .json · Public domain