Grattan v. Sigler’s Empirical Analysis
525 F.2d 329 · 1975
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Brown v. Lundgren (1976), Dye v. United States Parole Commission (1977)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 371 F. Supp. 156 - Lupo v. Norton · 371 F. Supp. 171 - Grasso v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This explanation came too late to serve the purpose of the Board's own regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Izsak v. Sigler“customary range of time to be served before release,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Izsak v. Sigler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.